Ask the Doctor
Ask the Doctor
ASK
THE DOCTOR
by Wesley
W. Wilson, MD
NOTE: If you have any questions
for "Ask the Doctor," please send them to the VOICE editorial office.
The only questions Dr. Wilson will be able to answer are the ones used in this
column.
Wesley Wilson, MD is an Internal Medicine practitioner
at the Western Montana Clinic in Missoula, Montana. Dr.
Wilson was diagnosed with type I diabetes in 1956, during
his second year of medical school.
Q: I read in the diabetes journals about a test called
an A1C. What is it, and how is it different from my daily
glucose monitoring? My diabetes educator and my doctor
disagree about my need for this test. How often should I
have an A1C?
A: Blood sugar, which you measure daily, fluctuates a
great deal from test to test and from hour to hour. I am
sure you would agree it is very hard, if not near
impossible, to keep your blood sugars within your "target
range" at all times, but these measurements are essential,
particularly for insulin-using diabetics, as they reveal how
high or low you are after meals, after insulin injections,
and especially before meals. A blood sugar reading from
your glucose monitor is a "snapshot," of your diabetes
control. It is essential, but even if done several times
each day, it does not really show your average blood sugar
control during a given 24-hour period of time.
There is growing evidence that in type I (insulin
dependent, IDDM) and type II (non insulin dependent, NIDDM)
diabetes, complications correlate with the average blood
sugar level over time. The higher the average blood sugar,
the greater the likelihood you'll develop diabetic
complications. The precise mechanism of development for
these complications; eye disease, kidney disease, and nerve
conduction disease, remains to some extent unknown, but it
would seem the underlying process is somehow related to
abnormalities of the proteins making up these structures:
the eye, blood vessels, kidney and nerve fibers. Increased
attachment of sugar to protein, a process known as
glycosylation (due to sustained high blood glucose levels)
seems a likely culprit.
Sugar attaches to proteins in any solution. The
greater the amount of sugar in a given solution, the greater
the amount of sugar that attaches to nearby proteins. It
has been known for years that sugar in the blood attaches to
the protein hemoglobin, a component of red blood cells. The
sugar attaches to the hemoglobin, or glycosylates it, in
direct relationship to the level of sugar in the solution
(the blood). Since red blood cells stay in the bloodstream
for about 110 days, measurement of the percentage of
hemoglobin that is glycosylated (has sugar attached to it)
can be used to give an estimate of the average blood sugar
level during the preceding six to eight weeks before blood
was drawn for the test. One name for this is "glycosylated
hemoglobin test."
Things always seem to become more complicated in
medicine! It is now known that there are several
differences within the glycosylated hemoglobin family. The
"hemoglobin A1C" you mentioned describes a single protein
with glucose attached to it. It is the one used most
frequently in monitoring diabetes, but many labs also run a
"hemoglobin A1," which gives a different value since it is a
different protein. The theory is the same, however.
Since hemoglobin A1C level correlates with the risk of
development of diabetic complications over time, measuring
hemoglobin A1C every three months allows us to estimate
average blood sugar level quite well from year to year, and
helps us act to reduce the risk of ramifications.
Unfortunately, there are considerable differences between
labs in the technique used to measure hemoglobin A1C and its
normal range. (The American Diabetes Association is
currently making an effort to standardize hemoglobin A1C
measurement and reportage.)
There must be some warning in interpreting hemoglobin
A1C values. Certain blood diseases can affect the
hemoglobin A1C, and thalassemia, an inherited disorder of
red blood cells that affects many individuals, particularly
of Mediterranean ethnicity, often causes a falsely high
hemoglobin A1C reading, even in persons who have normal
blood sugar levels. Many individuals with other blood
disorders can have falsely high hemoglobin A1C values.
When reviewing test results, it is important to
remember that the A1C test measures the "average" blood
sugar level. If a person has a "normal" hemoglobin A1C,
this may perhaps mean they have periods of excessive high
blood sugar, balanced by periods of abnormally low blood
sugar levels. We see this in some individuals whose blood
sugars are a bit elevated during the day (as revealed by
glucose meter), but who may have undetected low blood sugars
at night, so they end up with a "quite normal" hemoglobin
A1C, even though their diabetic control would be classified
as very unsatisfactory. That is why you need both tests:
measuring blood sugar levels frequently during the day, and
at least occasionally at night, to discover the specific
sugar levels at various times, but also measuring hemoglobin
A1C values four or five times a year to ensure that the
average blood sugar levels indicate adequate control.
Share a Comment