Airport Indignities One More Time
Airport Indignities One More Time
The Braille Monitor
December,
2003
(back)(next)(contents)
Airport Indignities
One More Time
by Joyce Scanlan
Joyce Scanlan
The airline bogeyman
is still out there, but Federation unity again triumphs. Remember the days when
air travel for blind people was a constant hassle? Our flight experience in
those days conditioned us to anticipate numerous problems as we dealt with airlines.
Would we be forced to preboard? Would flight attendants confiscate our white
canes? Would our preassigned seats be challenged because we had been placed
in an exit row? Would we be forced to listen to a preflight briefing, when everything
said to us was also repeated to all passengers over the public address system?
Since
implementation of the Air Carrier Access Act in 1990, air travel for blind people
has calmed down, becoming almost tolerable as we began to be treated with respect
and common decency. These routine problems, many of us had begun to think, were
now something from the forgotten past. And yet it all came back for many of
us recently as we returned from our 2003 national convention in Louisville,
Kentucky.
Twenty
to thirty blind people were spread out over gates 10 and 12 in the Louisville
Airport waiting for our Northwest Airlines flight to Minneapolis to be called.
Everyone was happily chatting, recounting the events of another successful national
convention.
At
last the long-awaited announcement of our flight came, offering preboarding
to first-class passengers and those needing a little more time, etc. Because
we were all seasoned travelers, we remained seated until our specific rows were
called. Then came a second announcement to the effect that "all those requiring
a preflight briefing must preboard." Since this also did not apply to this
group of blind people, we still remained seated.
Then
an authoritarian male voice came on saying, "We have about thirty handicapped
passengers who must preboard the airplane." This was immediately followed
by "We apologize to our other passengers if this flight is delayed by the
refusal of these special needs passengers to preboard." This tasteless
and humiliating statement caused all of us, without a single dissenting vote,
to sit tight. The announcer then went on to board the plane in the usual manner
from the rear to the front, and all of the blind people boarded when our rows
were called.
All
passengers boarded the plane, and the flight departed for Minneapolis on time.
No delay occurred, except for that caused by the panic-stricken ground crew,
who called the flight back to the gate because an electrical panel had been
left open and needed to be closed.
I
have flown on Northwest Airlines approximately once each month for many years
and have come to regard that airline with admiration because of the way ground
and flight crews throughout the country treated me. Of course, if one lives
in Minneapolis, Northwest is the most likely airline to go most places in the
United States. I knew on July 5 as we were leaving Louisville that many blind
people would be returning to their homes on our flight. It never occurred to
me that we would be treated as we were by the Louisville ground crew. I found
the announcements appalling.
The
reaction of the Federation crowd also caught me a little off guard. In the past,
as the anger and fear of airline personnel escalated, our reactions too might
have escalated. The reaction of Federationists present was to take everything
in stride. In a unified but spontaneous response, everyone sat quietly as these
rude and insulting announcements came over the loudspeaker. No one jumped up
to confront this attack on blind people. Instead everyone behaved responsibly
and maturely in order not to delay the flight or cause undue disruption.
We
have, however, written letters to Northwest Airlines officials drawing attention
to the incident as calling for education of ground and air personnel on the
courteous and appropriate treatment of blind passengers. Here is the letter
I sent on behalf of blind passengers of that flight:
July
16, 2003
Mr. Richard H. Anderson,
Chief Executive
Officer
Northwest Airlines,
Inc.
Dear
Mr. Anderson:
Many
years have passed since I felt compelled to write to Northwest Airlines to call
attention to a problem involving poor treatment of blind passengers by airline
personnel. Because I have personally experienced such positive and even-handed
treatment by both ground and flight personnel as I travel, mostly on Northwest
Airlines, all over the country, I was both appalled and disappointed at an incident
which took place as I was returning from Louisville, Kentucky, to Minneapolis
recently.
On
July 5, 2003, a number of blind passengers had gathered at gates 10 and 12 in
the Louisville Airport to await Northwest flight 873 to Minneapolis. We had
all attended the annual convention of the National Federation of the Blind held
at the Galt House Hotel in Louisville during the previous week. Everyone was
cheerfully conversing and recounting the events of a very exciting convention.
The first announcement of our flight was the routine statement by a female member
of the ground crew about preboarding. Something about "first-class passengers
and those needing a little extra time" being allowed to board at this time
was said. Every blind person present quietly remained seated, because, as competent
and experienced travelers, we saw no reason to respond to that call. Very soon
another announcement came saying, "All those requiring a preflight briefing
are asked to board at this time." Again, as people who regularly travel
by air, everyone remained seated.
The
third announcement was given by a very stern and angry-sounding, authoritarian
male voice. This announcement was greatly escalated in tone and said something
to the effect that "we have about twenty-two handicapped people who need
a special preflight briefing. We want these special needs people to preboard
at this time." Then came the most cutting and rude comment of all. The
announcer went on to say, "If these special needs people do not preboard
at this time, we apologize to all other passengers for the delay this will cause
in our flight today." Although I am sure every blind person in the group
was insulted by this remark, no one rose to board the plane.
Flight
officials then began to board the plane in the usual way, beginning at the back,
and blind people boarded as their rows were called. Everyone was boarded and
settled on time for the flight to take off at its scheduled time. I repeat,
the flight took off at its scheduled time. It should be added, however, that
the flight was called back to the gate because an electrical panel had been
left open and had to be closed before takeoff.
This
entire event might be written off as an isolated incident involving panic-stricken
ground staff on that day. Blind people were never confrontational; they conducted
themselves as responsible citizens and remained calm in the face of uncalled-for,
rude treatment.
I
urge you to provide appropriate education for your ground staff at the Louisville
airport, and I offer the expertise and assistance of the National Federation
of the Blind in providing that education. Regardless of how many blind people
may have been boarding that airplane--I heard anywhere from twenty-two to fifty--the
behavior of the ground personnel was absolutely inappropriate, insulting to
your blind customers, and totally uncalled-for. Such an assault on the dignity
of blind customers is not consistent with Northwest Airlines' service standards.
Thank you for your speedy response to this very serious matter.
Yours
truly,
Joyce Scanlan, President
National Federation
of the Blind of Minnesota
That
was the letter sent to Northwest Airlines regarding this unfortunate incident.
On August 1 Northwest notified me that they were investigating the incident
and would respond within thirty days.
While
I am certain every blind person aboard that flight on July 5 was outraged by
the treatment we received at the Louisville Airport, every single person deserves
commendation for perseverance and tasteful behavior under difficult circumstances.
I think of how it might have been fifteen or twenty years ago. There might have
been some argument or heated debate about what we should or should not do. None
of that occurred on July 5. We were, without discussion or disagreement, a unified,
cohesive group. We can hold our heads high and feel pride in ourselves and in
our unifying organization, the National Federation of the Blind.
There
you have the article that appeared in the Minnesota Bulletin. A number
of people wrote letters to Northwest Airlines. At least one of them received
a response--and a response that would have astonished us fifteen years ago.
Today, while gratifying, it is more an indication of just how much progress
we have made in educating airline officials, even if problems do still occur
from time to time. Here is the text of the letter that Judy Sanders received
to her letter of complaint to Richard Anderson:
August
26, 2003
Ms. Judy Sanders
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dear
Ms. Sanders:
Richard
Anderson has reviewed your letter and asked that I extend a sincere apology,
on behalf of everyone at Northwest Airlines, for the inappropriate behavior
of our Louisville gate representative on July 5.
As
explained in your correspondence, the gate representative for Flight 873 made
multiple and insistent announcements that persons with disabilities preboard
our flight and indicated that failure to heed his request could result in a
delayed departure. Your point that you had no personal reason to preboard is
well made, and the conduct by our representative that you described is entirely
contrary to the level of service that we want you to receive. Our airport public
contact personnel receive both extensive initial training and frequent recurrent
training. They are informed that our passengers are able bodied and need assistance
only to the extent that they personally request. Additionally, it is stressed
that no passenger is required to take advantage of a preboarding announcement.
The
actions of our gate representative have been discussed with him, and, while
we cannot reveal specifics of any internal or disciplinary action, please be
assured that we are committed to preventing a repetition of your experience.
We
need to hear from our customers and are very glad that you brought this matter
to our attention. You also have the right to contact the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Office of Consumer Affairs if you wish to pursue this matter
further.
Thank
you, again, for writing. Your support of Northwest is appreciated, and we hope
to have the continued privilege of serving your air travel needs.
Sincerely,
Richard Edlund, Administrator
Executive Communications
Northwest Airlines
St. Paul, Minnesota
(back)(next)(contents)
Share a Comment