Assistive Technology In The Kitchen
Assistive Technology In The Kitchen
Help! I'm Using Assistive Technology
In The Kitchen!
by Chris Cuppett
Reprinted from the Fall, 1995, issue of the Minnesota
Bulletin, the newsletter of the National Federation of the
Blind of Minnesota.
Editor's Note: Chris Cuppett is a blind woman who teaches
blindness skills (cooking, home management, daily living
skills, Braille, and so forth) to newly blinded senior
citizens. She travels from area to area in southern Minnesota
and sets up twelve-week training programs for blind senior
citizens at convenient local sites (such as the church she
mentions in her article). Chris is also a state and local
leader within the NFB of Minnesota, serving as a state board
member and president of her local chapter of the NFB. In this
article Chris uses humorous examples from her own use of low-
tech items in the kitchen to make a point about the human
factor in the use of technology, whether it be a simple
kitchen gadget or a complex talking computer with a voice
synthesizer. Here is Chris Cuppett's amusing look at assistive
technology:
I once attended a technology seminar in which the
facilitator told the audience one of the "granddaddies" of all
computer stories. One of his duties at a company which sold
adaptive hardware and software for people with disabilities
was to troubleshoot for consumers who might be experiencing
difficulty with their new equipment. One afternoon, right
about quittin' time, the phone rang. He was confronted by a
very irate caller who exploded: "My computer keeps telling me
to press any key to continue. Now you tell me, how am I
supposed to do that when there is no such thing as an any key
on my computer?"
That story got an uproarious response from the audience,
partly because the incident was outrageous, but also because
the members could relate on some level to the frustration the
caller was feeling. It seems that we mere mortals are
constantly engaged in a battle with machines, whether complex
or simple. These inanimate objects have been designed to help
us but we sometimes wonder if their real purpose is to drive
us to distraction as they persist in not doing what they are
supposed to do. We would like to blast the maladjusted
machines, but it doesn't often occur to us that maybe some
other cogs need adjusting. Let me elaborate further.
Since it is always healthy to laugh at oneself, I will
start by relating an incident that still makes me blush, and
then giggle, whenever I think of it. Anyone who has seen my
kitchen knows that I like to collect little gadgets that make
food preparation easier. In a discount store I happened upon
such a gadget that had a sturdy handle attached to several
thick, parallel wires. It was called a vegetable slicer, and
it was advertised to be especially good for dividing tomatoes
into nice, uniform slices. Perhaps with the exception of a few
prominent chefs, most of us would agree that a tomato tastes
the same no matter how you slice it. I was getting a bit
weary, however, of wielding a knife and having my tomato
slices turn out portly on one end and puny on the other. I
plunked down a dollar and some odd cents and vowed to have
perfect tomato slices from that moment on.
A few days later a friend with a very large garden gave
me several plump, juicy tomatoes. The next morning as I was
getting ready for work, I decided to pack up my handy, dandy
vegetable slicer and a few of these gorgeous love apples. What
a good idea, I thought, to demonstrate my new toy in front of
my students in my Lakefield class. (I think it must have been
one of those mornings when I hadn't had my second cup of
coffee. At least, I hope it was.)
This class was held in a beautiful, old Methodist church
with a huge kitchen in the basement. My colleague, Monica, and
I arrived at the church very early and we headed straight for
the kitchen. I was determined to do a trial run with my gadget
before demonstrating it for the class.
I got out one of my succulent tomatoes and placed it on
the counter. Picking up my vegetable slicer, I laid it on top
of the tomato and pressed down. (Well, gee, after all, I have
a slicer for hard-cooked eggs and it works something like
that.) When I lifted up the gadget, it didn't take long for me
to realize that I had done something unspeakable to my tomato.
It lay in a bloody heap all over the counter. I hollered,
"This thing doesn't work!" and Monica ran out of the room. (At
the time I thought she fled in disgust. Later she told me that
she had felt a giant laugh coming on and had found it
necessary to vacate the premises.) As I cleaned up the mess,
the whole thing didn't strike me as particularly funny, but
later I had some giant laughs of my own about it. I was
immensely relieved that my students hadn't witnessed "The
Great Tomato Massacre" in the Methodist Church. But I was able
to tell them about it later, and they had some giant laughs,
too.
When I attempted my experiment for the second time I
decided to lay my gadget on top of the tomato and try a gentle
sawing motion. Just as the advertisement promised, it produced
several splendid slices. The tomatoes were abundant and
wonderful this past summer, so I made many gentle sawing
motions with my vegetable slicer. Incidently, although the
gentle sawing takes a little longer, this gadget also produces
lovely orange cartwheels. (All right, already, so an orange
isn't a vegetable. Come to think of it, neither is a tomato.)
Moving on to a hotter topic, there is another inexpensive
gizmo on the market known as a flame tamer or a heat diffuser.
(To add to the confusion, some distributors of this product
now refer to it as a "simmer ring.") It's a flat metal device
with a wooden handle, and it doesn't look as if it would be
particularly functional. The purpose of the flame tamer is to
sit peacefully on the burner of any gas or electric stove and
to turn any kettle into a double boiler when the heat setting
is at medium or low. In other words, "Don't set your stove on
high, honey, or the thing won't tame your flame." It works
especially well for melting chocolate, for cooking hot cereal,
or for heating milk. It is also handy for keeping a casserole
warm if the casserole is removed from the oven and placed on
top of the flame tamer with the heat setting on low. The flame
tamer can be purchased at most hardware stores and it only
costs about two dollars. If the thing begins to look dull and
dingy after limited use, don't despair. This time you didn't
screw up. Your flame tamer isn't getting back at you for using
it incorrectly. The reaction of the metal with the heat
produces its lackluster appearance and no amount of scouring
or scrubbing will make it look shiny again. You can tell
anyone who really needs to know that your flame tamer has
served you well, and that is why it looks the way it does.
Another popular low-tech item with multiple names is the pot
watcher, boil master, or boil mate. (In this article I will
refer to it as the pot watcher.) It looks like a miniature
ashtray or a caster on the bottom of a chair leg. (Now doesn't
that description make you want to rush right out and get one?)
This sturdy little Pyrex disk slips comfortably into a kettle
of water and breaks up the little bubbles as the water begins
to boil. While it rattles merrily in the bottom of a kettle,
it keeps pasta and potatoes from boiling all over the place.
(One of my students tried out her new toy in a kettle of fresh
beets. She was happy to report that for the first time in
years she didn't need to scrub red stains off her kitchen
wall.) The pot watcher is sold in many specialty catalogs, in
kitchen gadget stores, and in a few department stores. Many of
my students have purchased this inexpensive and grief-saving
device.
But sales of pot watchers could have plummeted to an all-
time low after an incident that occurred in one of my classes
a few months ago. One of the counselors from State Services
for the Blind stopped by our classroom to see how things were
going. After chatting briefly with the students, she summoned
me into the hallway. It was soon very clear that our
discussion was not going to be about the progress of the
students but rather about the dangers of our precious pot
watcher. The previous evening she had used one to prepare
spaghetti when suddenly she heard a loud crack. Rushing to the
stove, she retrieved a badly cracked pot watcher from her
kettle of pasta. For some reason she lightly tapped the gadget
on the countertop and watched in disbelief as it disintegrated
into a million pieces. "What if that pot watcher had shattered
when it was still in the pot?" she said with obvious concern
in her voice. "That could have been really dangerous. Maybe
these things are defective. I wonder if we should be
recommending them."
"Maybe not," I replied sadly. "I guess I'll have to tell
our students not to buy them after all."
"Do you remember any former students who have already
bought these things?"
"Well, yes, I remember some of them."
"Maybe it wouldn't hurt to get on the phone and tell them
to throw these pieces of junk in the garbage."
I sighed and headed slowly back to the classroom. Those
of us who had purchased them had grown to love our little pot
watchers. Now I would have to deliver the bad news.
The counselor's voice broke into my thoughts. "Wait a minute,"
she said, "I just thought of something. I dropped the pot
watcher into the water after it was already boiling. I bet
that wasn't right. Maybe it always has to start out in cold
water."
"That's the way I've always used it," I said. I had never
bothered to check the directions on the package, though.
Somehow I had lucked out in managing to use my pot watcher
correctly. Not long after the near demise of many pot
watchers, I asked someone to read the directions on the
package. Sure enough, the instructions went something like
this: "Place the pot watcher into a kettle of cold water."
My original intent was to attach a moral to this tangled
web. You know, something like: "The computer is only as good
as its programmer," or "If at first you don't succeed, read
the instructions." But you've heard all that stuff before,
haven't you?
I have just finished proofreading the material I have
written so far on my Braille 'n Speak, my little computerized
word processor with a male voice. I don't suppose it was
really his fault that there were several typographical errors
that I had to correct, but it was great fun bawling him out
anyway. In his obnoxiously controlled voice he promptly
informed me that if I were ever to behave in such a manner
again, he would quietly delete all my files; and how did I
like them apples? All right. I'll be good. I promise.
Share a Comment