Special Note From The Editor
Special Note From The Editor
The Jury Comes Down Hard on Maxi-Aids:
A Special Note from the Editor
Occasionally in the blindness field a circumstance so
extraordinary arises that it demands unusual treatment in these pages. The recent U.S.
District Court decision in the Eastern District of New York in the case of Independent
Living Aids versus Maxi-Aids is such an instance. The entire March issue is, therefore,
devoted to telling the story of this case as it unfolded. We have tried to do so chiefly
in the actual words of the trial transcript prepared by the court reporter, so to the lay
mind the narrative line may sometimes seem somewhat repetitive and slow-moving. But it
seemed important as far as possible to let the principals tell the story in their own
words and to let their actions, as described in their testimony, speak for themselves.
It is important, however, to remember that the case is by no means over. As the
counsel for the
defense, Mark Mulholland, Esq., told me in no
Barbara Pierce
uncertain terms, this decision was only the first round in this case. He explained that in
copyright infringement cases the initial damages established by the jury are quite
likely—more likely than in almost any other type of case—to be reduced by later
court action.
Nonetheless, for four weeks people testified in open court
about the actions of the defendants and the plaintiff and the policies of the two
companies. After hearing the evidence and spending time carefully considering what they
had heard, a jury came to certain conclusions. That story and those conclusions have
implications and repercussions for the entire blindness field. For this reason we have
devoted the March issue to an account of this trial and only this trial. The April issue
will be published soon and will contain the convention information for which everyone has
been eagerly waiting. Meanwhile we commend to your attention the important matter of
Independent Living Aids and Marvin Sandler versus Maxi-Aids and the Zaretsky family. Read
carefully and ponder.
Share a Comment