The Axe and the Lawbook
The Axe and the Lawbook
THE AXE AND THE LAW BOOK
by Marc Maurer
Abraham Lincoln wielded and axe, and he also
became a
lawyer. Although Marc Maurer has never been
elected President of
the United States, he has followed Lincoln's
footsteps with the
axe and the lawbook. Living in different
centuries, both Lincoln
and Maurer had hardships to overcome--and both
succeeded when
they might have despaired and given up.
No, Marc Maurer has never been elected President
of the
United States--but he has been elected President
of the National
Federation of the Blind, a position he holds
today. And the
lives of countless blind people are better as a
result. Here is
how he tells the story of his development.
Many of the toys I was given as a child were
mechanical. Toy
cars and trucks often contained mechanisms
attached to the wheels
that made a noise when the vehicle was pushed
across the floor. I
wanted to know what was inside, and I took them
apart. But this
was not all. Alarm clocks, mechanical ice-cream
dippers, egg
beaters, door knob assemblies, electric motors,
our family lawn
mower, the vacuum cleaner, and anything else I
hadn't been
forbidden to touch--I took them all apart.
Then came the question of putting them together
again. Those
who have taken an alarm clock to pieces know how
difficult this
can be. The spring shoots out, and the pieces go
everywhere. Even
if you can find all the parts, it is hard to tell
which tiny
wheel or spring goes where.
The first time that I dismantled a piece of
machinery which
was not working and reassembled it so that it
functioned
properly, I was delighted. I began to examine
everything with the
idea that I might "fix it."
Although I was then--as I am now--blind, I became
the fixer
for our family. My father was the principal
fixer, but he was a
traveling salesman, and he was often away from
home. If an
electrical cord needed a new plug, if a curtain
rod needed
hanging, if a hinge on a door had become
loosened, if the washers
in a faucet needed to be replaced--I was the one
to be called
upon to put it right.
I even got to work on our second car, a nineteen
fifty-four
Plymouth. My Dad forbade me to monkey with the
internal
mechanisms of the new car. He drove that one for
work, and he did
not want me fiddling with it. He would let me
change the tires if
they were flat or put the new license plates on.
He would even
let me look at the engine if I wanted to. I just
couldn't do
anything to it.
My father had many tools, and he shared them with
me and
taught me to use them. But he had very little
experience with
blindness, and he did not know how blind people
use power
machinery. He gave me an electric drill, and he
let me use his
disk sander, but he did not encourage me to use
the power saws.
He thought that using them was beyond the
capabilities of a blind
boy, and I agreed with him.
In 1969, I met Dr. Kenneth Jernigan, who was then
serving as
President of the National Federation of the
Blind. I was a
student in Dr. Jernigan's program for training
blind adults. In
that program there was no prohibition against
blind students
using power tools.
There were hand tools, of course, but there were
the big
ones, too--a table saw, a planer, a radial arm
saw, a joiner, a
wood lathe, a metal lathe, a vertical mill, a
drill press, and
more. And best of all, I was not prohibited from
using them. I
was expected to make them function. I was
expected to learn how
to use the machines and to demonstrate my
knowledge by building
something. During the time that I was in the
program I hoisted an
engine out of a car, tore it to pieces, and
rebuilt it.
One cold winter day we traveled to a wooded area.
I took one
end of a two-man cross cut saw, and before the
day was through we
had cut down a tree more than three feet thick.
It was exciting
and fun.
Although I was a student in Dr. Jernigan's
program, I knew
that the time was approaching for me to go to
college. The fun
that I had had manipulating tools made me wonder
whether I should
study engineering.
Dr. Jernigan encouraged me not to be limited by a
single
perspective. How mechanical things fit together
can be
interesting, he told me, but there are other
fascinating ideas as
well. How do organizations accomplish their
goals? How do
governments achieve their objectives? What is it
that makes
people persuasive? What are the characteristics
that cause an
individual to be a leader? How is opportunity
created? What are
the driving forces behind social change? How are
the decisions
reached within society to select one direction
over another? Not
only did Dr. Jernigan pose these challenging
questions, but he
also introduced me to a startling new idea.
I, as a blind person, could--if I possessed the
ability and
the willingness to work--help to decide the
answers. If I could
learn how social structures worked, and if I
could discover how
change was created, I might be able to help
contribute to the
building of a nation.
Before I became a part of the National Federation
of the
Blind, I believed that I might be able to replace
a broken leaf
spring or to balance a flywheel. But I never
imagined that I
would be able to participate in determining
broader questions.
With the help of my friends in the National
Federation of
the Blind, I enrolled at the University of Notre
Dame. After
graduating with honor from Notre Dame, I entered
law school. For
many centuries the law has been among the honored
professions.
In law school I learned that the law, the courts,
and the
judicial system are not mysterious or
unknowable--not beyond the
mental capacity of a blind student--not an
unattainable goal. The
law is a tool to be used to achieve a stable and
a civilized
society. It changes to meet the demands of that
society. In the
hands of a skillful artisan the law can be used
to bring about
the most worthwhile results. And it possesses a
great deal of
power.
Early in my legal career I learned that a
seventy-six year
old woman had (four years earlier) been declared
criminally
insane. Agnes had been placed behind bars in the
mental hospital
for criminals. When I questioned the doctor about
her case, he
told me that Agnes was perfectly sane. I asked
for permission to
interview her in the hospital, and she asked me
to represent her
in the courts.
Agnes had been good friends with her neighbor
Clara--a woman
somewhat younger than she. To Agnes' amazement,
Clara stole
Agnes' husband. There was a fight, and Agnes was
hauled off by
the police. Clara told the arresting officer that
Agnes was
having strange hallucinations, and she repeated
her testimony in
the court. Agnes was adjudged to be insane.
Unless something could be done to change the
circumstances,
Agnes would live out the remainder of her life in
the mental
hospital. I prepared a petition of habeas corpus
and presented it
to the court. The prosecuting attorney refused to
consider an
adjudication without court proceedings. The
matter came on for
hearing, and I prepared witnesses to present
evidence. The doctor
repeated under oath what he had told me in our
private
conversation. Medical evidence indicated that
Agnes was sane.
After the evidence had been presented it was time
for
argument to the court. Locking a person who is
sane in a hospital
for the criminally insane is the same as putting
that person in
jail. Our law states unequivocally that no person
may be put
permanently in jail unless that person has been
convicted of a
crime. Even if a conviction has occurred, a judge
must decide how
long the sentence will be.
Agnes had already been in the hospital for four
years and
she was facing the real possibility of life
behind bars. I asked
the court to release this seventy-six year old
lady. The judge
gave the order that we wanted.
Although I have handled many different kinds of
cases in my
career, most of the legal practice that I do
today involves
individuals who are blind, or corporations
established to assist
the blind. The diversity of experience I have had
in the courts
has helped to give me perspective and
understanding in the things
I do today.
As I think about the tools that I have used in my
lifetime
(both those that are mechanical and those that
are not), I am
astonished and pleased to note that the learning
never stops. In
1993 my son David joined the Cub Scouts. A new
pack was being
formed at the church we attend. Despite my
inexperience (I had
never been a Scout), I was asked to serve as an
assistant leader.
As a part of my responsibility, I participated in
the 1994 fall
Camporee.
In this event the scouts go out into the woods,
set up
tents, build fires, cook their meals, and
practice outdoor
skills: recognizing and following tracks, tying
different kinds
of knots, building shelters with the materials at
hand in the
forest, learning to load a backpack, and chopping
wood. The wood
chopping exercise demands precision. A wooden
match stick is
placed on the chopping block with its striking
end up. The Scout
is expected to split the match with a hatchet.
Extra points are
given (they say) if the match lights as you cut
it.
I was the leader, so I was not asked to perform
this feat. I
was glad not to be expected to perform in public.
Even though I
have a great respect and a great appreciation for
good tools, I
had never used a hatchet or an axe.
I thought about why this was so. I remember quite
well the
story of the tin woodman from the Wizard of Oz.
He made a number
of mistakes with his axe. One at a time he cut
off each of his
legs and each of his arms. They had to be
replaced with tin. Then
he slipped once more and cut his body so that it
had to be
replaced as well.
I came to understand that using an axe was a
dangerous thing
to do. Although I would probably not have said
so, I thought it
was too dangerous and too impractical for a blind
person.
Consequently, I never tried. All of this is what
I thought on
that camping trip. How often we create our own
limitations and
restrict our activities because we don't believe
there is any
possibility of doing otherwise.
Later in the fall of 1994 I borrowed a hatchet
and, working
with my son David, chopped out a stump in the
yard of one of my
neighbors. I have always liked physical work with
tools. Perhaps
this is because I spend most of my working days
in an office,
meeting with people and managing documents.
The fireplace in my house needs wood to make the
evenings
pleasant. Each fire requires kindling. I suppose
it is possible
to buy it, but my son and I have begun making it
ourselves. He
uses the hatchet he got for Christmas, and I use
an axe. Neither
one of us is very good at it yet. But we enjoy
being with each
other; we enjoy the outdoors; and we enjoy the
physical exertion.
We also feel good about learning a new skill. We
hope to become
competent at using the tools that helped to clear
the forests
from our nation to give us the productive farm
land that has fed
this country for so many years, and we like to
have kindling for
the fire.
We keep the tin woodman in mind. We don't want to
have
artificial legs, so we play it safe. But we don't
let the worries
about safety keep us from using the tools.
In the National Federation of the Blind we offer
hope and
encouragement to blind people who believe that
the possibility
for having a full life is ended by blindness. We
know that blind
people can perform most jobs that are done by the
sighted. We
know that blindness is not the thing that will
stop a blind
person but that negative attitudes about
blindness are. I learned
this when I joined the organization in 1969, and
I have had this
learning reinforced from time to time throughout
the years.
In the fall of 1994 with an axe in my hand, I
learned it
again. I may never spend a significant amount of
my time using
an axe, but it isn't because I'm blind. I thought
that it
couldn't be done--that my muscles might do many
things, but they
would never feel the bite of the axe blade in the
wood. Because
the Federation taught me to explore what I
thought I could not
do, and because my son wanted to go camping, I
have learned to
swing an axe.
Share a Comment